* Step 1: Bounds WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Strict TRS:
            c(y) -> y
            c(a(a(0(),x),y)) -> a(c(c(c(0()))),y)
            c(c(c(y))) -> c(c(a(y,0())))
        - Signature:
            {c/1} / {0/0,a/2}
        - Obligation:
             runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {c} and constructors {0,a}
    + Applied Processor:
        Bounds {initialAutomaton = perSymbol, enrichment = match}
    + Details:
        The problem is match-bounded by 2.
        The enriched problem is compatible with follwoing automaton.
          0_0() -> 1
          0_0() -> 3
          0_1() -> 4
          0_1() -> 5
          0_1() -> 6
          0_1() -> 7
          0_2() -> 10
          a_0(1,1) -> 2
          a_0(1,1) -> 3
          a_0(1,2) -> 2
          a_0(1,2) -> 3
          a_0(2,1) -> 2
          a_0(2,1) -> 3
          a_0(2,2) -> 2
          a_0(2,2) -> 3
          a_1(4,1) -> 3
          a_1(4,2) -> 3
          a_2(7,10) -> 4
          a_2(7,10) -> 8
          a_2(7,10) -> 9
          c_0(1) -> 3
          c_0(2) -> 3
          c_1(5) -> 4
          c_1(6) -> 4
          c_1(6) -> 5
          c_1(7) -> 4
          c_1(7) -> 5
          c_1(7) -> 6
          c_2(8) -> 4
          c_2(9) -> 4
          c_2(9) -> 8
          1 -> 3
          2 -> 3
          5 -> 4
          6 -> 4
          6 -> 5
          7 -> 4
          7 -> 5
          7 -> 6
          8 -> 4
          9 -> 4
          9 -> 8
* Step 2: EmptyProcessor WORST_CASE(?,O(1))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Weak TRS:
            c(y) -> y
            c(a(a(0(),x),y)) -> a(c(c(c(0()))),y)
            c(c(c(y))) -> c(c(a(y,0())))
        - Signature:
            {c/1} / {0/0,a/2}
        - Obligation:
             runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {c} and constructors {0,a}
    + Applied Processor:
        EmptyProcessor
    + Details:
        The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1).

WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))